July 30, 2010

Choices - Universal Healthcare vs. Universal Destruction

by Diane V. McLoughlin, writer, peace activist
                  -  main website mcloughlinpost.com

Although I am an agnostic, and consider myself to be an independent politically, one of the many newsletters I subscribe to is Chuck Baldwin's.  Baldwin is an American politician.  He ran for President under the Constitution Party banner in 2008.  He is also founder-pastor of Crossroad Baptist Church in Pensacola, Florida (Wikipedia.)  

On some things Mr. Baldwin and I agree.  This is very interesting to me.  For example, we both support the repeal of the Patriot Act. 

But there are areas where we differ.  I respectfully wish to address in particular the importance of political compromise, and, specifically, for perhaps surprising reasons, on the issue of universal health care.
I feel it is imminently worthwhile to engage. The Constitution Party opposes not only the Iraq war, but any war that is not officially declared by Congress, and any war that is not necessary for America's defense. 

Mr. Baldwin writes that patriots:

Are 'strong proponents of the principles contained in the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights. [Me:  check.] 

'You also readily acknowledge that our rights come from God, not government.'  [I believe rights do not come from government; they are natural rights that are an intrinsically inherent aspect of the nature of Man, whether you believe in God or not.]

Baldwin:

That patriots, 'believe in a limited federal government and would never aid and abet the burgeoning surveillance state that both the federal and some State and local governments are creating, meaning you would never allow your business to be used by the government to trample the personal and privacy rights of citizens. In other words, you oppose the so-called USA Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, and any other act that abridges protections guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.'  [double, triple check.]

Further, 'you are neither a neocon nor a liberal [check.]

'In other words, you support the principles of limited government; [me: honest, effective government];

'do not believe America should fight preemptive, undeclared wars; [CHECK!];

'oppose Obamacare (socialized medicine); ['Obamacare' is too flawed; hobbled by private, for-profit interests];

'resent the growing police state; [check];

'and refuse to vote for "the lesser of two evils" for the sake of party partisanship.  [This is the coming-together problem, right here.]

The Constitution Party is anti-abortion [gray areas for me];

Anti-illegal immigration [squeamy on this.  Reluctantly, the law is the law. Some hospitals and school districts are drowning in red ink because of illegals who don't pay taxes but eat up public services.]

They are pro right-to-bear-arms (and believe a patriot business owner would therefore, for example, 'never prevent lawfully armed citizens from entering your establishment.' [Yikes!  For your interest, there is something like a hundred to one difference in gun mortality rates between the U.S. and gun-controlled Canada.]

The big shapes:  I feel that the initiative is slipping away and time is running out.  What is most important is two-fold:  fostering peace and protecting constitutional rights - for all the world's citizens. 

The Achilles Heel holding all of us back is our unwillingness to compromise even a little bit to get the job done.  The malevolent exaggeration of differences between Americans should cease. This is no esoteric exercise in argument.  People's lives are being destroyed - ours and our neighbors:  American, Palestinian, Israeli, Pakistani, Iraqi, Afghani...

Which brings me to a point of compromise for the Constitution Party to consider:

'...the suicide rate for soldiers who first entered the Army in their late 20s was three times higher than for those in the younger group.

'General Chiarelli said he did not want to typecast, “but I think it’s fair to say in some instances it would be a soldier that’s possibly married, couple of kids, lost his job, no health care insurance, possibly a single parent.” Such a soldier, General Chiarelli said, “is coming in the Army to start all over again, and we see this high rate of suicide.”  [From: 'Pentagon Report Places Blame for Suicides'; Elizabeth Bumiller; NYT; July 29, 2010.]

The above statistic is shocking.  In order for men and women to provide for their families, they are enlisting in the government's wars to kill overseas so that their children don't starve or die for lack of jobs and accessible health care at home. 




The Constitution Party does not believe in no government; it believes in limited government.  As surely as a well-paved, publicly-paid-for road gets us safely from A to B, the issue of universal health care is a matter of conscience that no one of any religious creed or political persuasion would deny their neighbor.

Now, it would appear that in its denial to American families, lack of healthcare plays its part in the war machine's inexorable roll to universal destruction.

July 19, 2010

Israeli PM Netanyahu: I "stopped" Oslo peace process - ENGLISH SUBTITLES

Q's to Tony Blair, OQR - on Aid, Siege, Natural Gas and Gaza

July 19, 2010 siege

Mr. Tony Blair, Office of the Quartet Representative,

I am writing for clarification re the OQR's recent suggestions that all attempts to get aid into Gaza
be directed to 'established' channels.

Israel denies entry of essentials.

Aid workers and humanitarians want to go around the entry points that Israel continues to illegally control,
in order, presumably, to get aid in that Israel keeps out.

So, if aid is directed to established entry points, then aid - pencils, paper, notebooks, ink, computers,
cement, etc., etc., etc. - will continue to be kept out by Israel.

Yes or no?

If yes, in what ways does encouraging aid efforts to, in effect, cease, do anything to boost the OQR's position in pushing a just peace, in your opinion?

If, on the other hand, the OQR has enjoyed substantive success in pushing Israel forward on easing restrictions on Gaza, what are they and toward what ultimate end? Can we foresee a complete lifting of the siege, and if so, when?

Last question: What does the OQR have to say about Israel's reported theft of Gaza's natural gas
deposits off-shore? Surely funds generated by its harvest and sale would go a long way to improving
the lives of Gaza's citizens, and so deflate emotions caused by want, fear and a life of economic uncertainty?
-------------------------------

Diane V. McLoughlin editor, mcloughlinpost.com

July 18, 2010

Bent Over - Canadian Victims of Israel's Attack on Gaza Freedom Flotilla Speak Out - Sort Of

by Diane V. McLoughlin, July 16, 2010, mcloughlinpost.com

There were six ships, 663 people both old and young - men and women from 37 different countries
bearing 10,000 tons of humanitarian aid. Three ships, one of them the Mavi Marmara, carried peace
activists and humanitarians while the others carried the donated relief supplies.

They set sail to Gaza May 30th, 2010, with plans to reach Gaza May 31st. Gaza's barbed-wire and
high cement wall-enclosed ghetto imprisons 1.5 million men, women and children. Israel's brutal,
illegal military blockade of Gaza is entering its fourth year. The aim of Israel's siege is to crush Gaza
economically for political purposes - to force Gazans to forfeit any claims to stolen homes and lands
taken from them by Israel in 1948; to accept a life of liberty denied.

The flotilla was informed by the Israeli navy that they had extended - arbitrarily, it would seem - the
military blockade of Gaza's territorial waters to sixty kilometers, from eight.

The flotilla participants knew that the endeavor to reach Gaza with relief supplies was not fraught
with risk. The peaceful and unarmed flotilla was attacked by Israel's navy without provocation in
international waters - a crime, whether within or outside Israel's illegal blockade (for brevity's sake, I
will henceforth refer to all forms of Israel's military as the IDF, short for the Israeli defense force.)

On the evening of July 10th, accompanied by my son's best friend, Aidan Parchelo, a gifted chap
university-bound, we attended an evening jointly put on by the Palestinian Canadian Congress;
Independent Jewish Voices; and the Ottawa-Palestine Solidarity Network. The purpose of the event
was to hear eyewitness testimony from a peace activist named Kevin Neish, and Farooq Burney of
educational rights organization fakhoora.org. Both were passengers on the Mavi Marmara when it
was attacked.

We arrived early at the Ben Franklin Place meeting room in what once was Nepean's City Hall
(Nepean since becoming amalgamated with the City of Ottawa.) In the rather dated room, which
was capable of holding several hundred, I counted no more than thirty-five attendees. For some
inexplicable reason, with so many empty seats from which to choose, some slovenly fathead of a
man sat directly behind me, kicking my seat with his bouncing foot the entire time even after a polite
request that he cease - which was met with a heavy, put-upon sigh.

Neish - white, six foot, balding and rumpled in jeans and plaid shirt - was providing a rather nervous,
kinetic running commentary to a grainy, shaky, smuggled-out video clip of unfolding events of the
attack on the Mavi Marmara. Little was clear beyond the physically palpable fear of those captured
on film, much of it taken in a stairwell of people huddled up and down steps with lifejackets on;
occasionally, prone bodies are awkwardly carried/dragged through. Surreal, that observant Muslims
in lifejackets felt compelled to continue prayer on deck, clearly as unarmed as everybody else, as the
sounds of mayhem and terror echoed round about.



                                                                                            - Mavi Marmara

Kevin Neish is a Canadian peace activist who lives in Victoria, British Columbia.  According to Neish, Zionists denounce him as anti-Semitic.  No, "I'm anti-bully, anti-racist". He started out on the flotilla boat Challenger; a 270 ft. long yacht which left from Crete; Israelis bragged they sabotaged ships; 'our ship, seam split taking on water; a dozen activists transferred to Mavi; all bags searched [by Mavi Mavara participants] no weapons of any kind permitted'; even his pocketknife taken away (a handy item, I carry one myself.)

Neish intended to go to Gaza and reside there for eight months or so as a human rights observer, working with the international solidarity movement.  He had approximately four-thousand dollars for living expenses on him. Israelis took all of his possessions, his I.D. and all his money.  After, if Turkey hadn't helped him he would have had no means of getting home.

Farooq Burney's fakhoora.org is dedicated to fighting for the educational rights of Palestinian young people.  Burney - slim, compact, well-groomed in jeans and bright-looking - he chose to be a part of the flotilla because he wanted to show solidarity to the young people of Gaza.  He deeply believes in equality of educational opportunity.  Schools in Gaza were targeted by the IDF during the military assault late 2008, early 2009' the Israelis refer to this attack as Operation Cast Lead.

fakhoora.org brought 65 computers destined for Gaza university students.  Burney: education is a fundamental human right; al fakhoora is the name taken from a destroyed Gaza school where forty students were killed in the IDF assault.

The testimonies of Neish and Burney tended to go back and forth in a rather free flow of information.  The following is from them both, verbatim. I typed trying my best to capture the essence of what I heard, as one or the other of them spoke:

Notebooks, medical supplies were also on the ships.  Wanted to reach Gaza during daybreak.

12:30 A.M. Mavi Marmara is contacted by Israeli navy;  captain asked to identify ship, destination; navy - 'you are entering forbidden waters'; captain asks for navy's coordinates, no response; we know we are being followed by war ships; half hour later we see lights from vessels; captain detours to avoid interception before daybreak, recommended everyone try to get some rest.

3:30 A.M. captain announced we are being surrounded by twelve military ships, anything could happen; we put on lifejackets;

4 A.M. Muslim call to prayer; also a watchful human chain around ship is made; zodiacs come alongside 20 commandos full gear guns threw smoke grenades into ship causing panic; gunshots and bullets (live? Rubber?); people getting hit, injured; beside me (Neish) man fell down unconscious; helicopters; hand to hand combat; water hoses used to try to repel IDF; third pass helicopter firing on ship, people being hit, an older gentleman hit in chest with bullet...

Literally, nuts and bolts were collected by some to throw at helicopter gunships (Neish thought this was 'nuts'); IDF - uses tear gas; water hoses used to spray Israelis away from ship; Neish retreated to stairwell, too dangerous on deck; Arab workers swarmed well-armed IDF commandos, took weapons and dumped bullets overboard while saving at least one disabled gun as evidence; commandos were treated well and protected...

Unnerving:  A laminated hit-list complete with names and photographs of activists was discovered in an IDF commando backpack...

IDF murder:  Two Turkish aid workers with bullet holes on side of heads - executed; more killed this same way...

Captain:  We are not going to Gaza (so everybody surrendered)...

Netanyuhu:  These were 'ships of hate'; Neish:  If that is so, why did they stop resisting once they knew they could not get to Gaza?

freegaza.org:  We are raising money to send a ship next September [applause from audience].

Forty-five minutes, ship was taken; not going to Gaza; return to main sitting area; we went down and locked doors; IDF surrounds ship, points guns with lasers...

Three dead where we were; injured; not resisting; people are dying, request assistance; one hour before IDF opens the door, brings the injured to two women; ordered 'come out with hands on heads, only bring passports and any meds'; frisked; IDF tied hands behind backs; kneel face wall; six hours; people denied bathrooms; no talking; elderly people in pain, passing out; hands turning purple swelling like balloons...

7:30 A.M. to 1 P.M.: ordered back down to original sitting area; IDF ransacked the place, ripping seat cushions; told going to Israeli town of Ashdod; reached 6 P.M.; no food 24 hours; no water; even if could get water, not allowed to go to washroom so...

They had taken away dead and injured; told sixteen to nineteen dead by a fellow Mavi Marmara traveller who was a Knesset member - widespread shock, grief - six to twelve hours' wait for captors to be taken off ship; cheers from supporters on-shore...

Searched our bodies...

Interrogations:  We are a humanitarian country [laughter from audience]; do you believe in the state of Israel?...

Prison bus...

Prison:  Request phone calls, lawyers - denied; next day 9 A.M. request contact embassies, families - denied;  11 A.M. get back in cells; locked cells; fresh IDF prison trainees, young, eighteen to twenty years old, laughing at us like monkeys in cages...

Canadian embassy will try to get you out as soon as possible; female staff member departs with 'all the best' [Burney:  All the best?!?]  - 'but if they move you, please call us to let us know...' [more laughter from audience...hello, Kafka]...

Jordanian Ambassador took all of one hour and a half to remove all Jordanians, Algerians, Kuwaitis, Pakistanis - assumed the duty to help all of them...

3 A.M.  all Turkish citizens released; 8 A.M. everybody out (Europeans, Canadians)...

The prison was surrounded by media; papers we had to sign...

Israelis: 'Why are you in Israel?'  Answer: 'I didn't want to go to Israel'...

(Seriously?) - We were charged with illegally entering Israel so that's why we were in jail...

Turkish government had sent planes to pick up, will not leave unless all the people - dead or alive - are on the planes.

Neish: 'If it weren't for the Turkish government I might still be there'; twelve hours on the planes on Ashdod tarmac to make sure we did not leave anyone behind; landed in Istanbul; there were two (gives sense they were exceedingly unhelpful) from Canadian consulate; Neish sincerely thanks Turkish consular official in audience for his country's generous help - hotel, flight to Toronto, meals...appears deeply moved by Turkish humanitarian aid given to him. 

Kevin Neish:  Wrote an open letter to Canadian government, asking why the government had not said anything; did not negotiate our release; all our belongings, cash, phones, laptops, cameras - stolen;

Farooq Burney:  Director, founded fakhoora.org; UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 26:  Everyone has a right to an education; young people are not allowed to leave Gaza to pursue their educations; supports reconstruction of schools in Gaza destroyed by Israel, as well as prosthetics for those crippled from IDF Operation Cast Lead attack of 2008-09; 1,383 dead; eighteen schools destroyed; crowded classrooms; professors assaulted at checkpoints; inadequate school supplies;  pencils, ink, paper, notebooks, computers - all are items that Israel bans from entering Gaza.

fahoora.org supports psychological counseling - many are traumatized by the ongoing siege; provides one-hundred educational scholarships for higher education for students in Gaza for three to five-year programs [audience applause.]

Join:  'United Against the Blockade of Gaza' - Facebook; looking for signatures/signees;

Questions-and-Answers portion of the evening:

How many were killed?  Nine dead, seven missing; six of the missing, no families came forward -six were possibly spies [murmurs, 'ohh', from audience].

Burney, to a question:  Israelis refused to let him out of jail cell to speak to Canadian consular officials - who were nice people but clueless; Canadian Ambassador should have come to personally get the Canadians out like the Jordanians did; called out 'Don't leave me!', as he realized to his horror that the consular officials were actually leaving the prison without him.  Cell is 4 X 6 ft.; very hard to be in cell - what will happen?  You don't know.  Scary.  Guards:  We haven't heard from Canadian Embassy.

My wife is calling Kuwait, no response; Ottawa asks her - where was he born(!) He's Canadian - he has a Canadian passport (came to Canada as a kid from Pakistan); Ottawa: 'well, maybe he went with them?'

Neish:  Actions, response of Canada - Harper, MP's - nothing, re info of illegal things done to me; in contrast, Turkish government flew us out; hotel, meals covered - flew Neish to Toronto for free - where is the Canadian government - nothing;  asked the local Canadian authority to get him home to Victoria, B.C.; seventy pounds of luggage, got twenty pounds back from Israel, mostly just dirty laundry; four grand cash stolen; heard nothing from Canadian authorities.

Where are the ships?  Ashdod.  Seized.

Strip searches; body cavity searches; Neish managed to smuggle out a chip of film; machine guns; dogs; batons; after twelve hours of being painfully bound no food, no water, no bathroom, taken off of ship; yanked tight hand restraints when asked for washroom; Neish's hands are damaged still; bad treatment, very hard on the elderly...

One of the first persons killed was media, shot in head; camera man shot in arm...

Neish:  I would be dead for challenging the soldiers if I wasn't white.

Recommendation:  Don't sign anything until you see a lawyer and you know everybody is safe...

Former U.S. citizen, guy from Ireland beaten to a pulp - boots taken to him - two days later in Istanbul guy is still covered in dried blood (name - Ken O'Keefe).

Q. re the Mavi footage showing soldiers being beaten - true?  Answer: There were a hundred or more passengers with gunshot wounds; there were shootings happening even before the commandos were on the deck; people were already dead before the soldiers got down; dozens wounded [read: self-defense.]

There is a scheduled meeting July 15th in Istanbul to discuss filing a lawsuit against Israel.

A pleasant looking guy in a suit sitting across from me, former Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs Flora McDonald on the other side of him, asked what can be done to counter the extreme media bias in Canada?

Several questions later it's my turn with the mike, which was shepherded to each seated guest in their turn. Off-the-cuff public speaking usually makes me a nervous wreck.   I thank the panel for their bravery and for speaking this evening, as well as the efforts of the organizers.

I identify myself and my website, mcloughlinpost.com, by way of sharing my view that lots of people care and lots of people try to counter the mainstream media bias - but that it's hard to get it out there.  I invited everyone to visit my website where I post essays I write, but also, that I try to use my website as a source for information - for example, I have good information on boycott, divestment and sanctions (smattering of applause for BDS.)  Cut and polished diamonds are an interesting item:  cut and polished diamonds make up something like thirty percent of Israel's entire export market.

Neish pipes up [aggressively? Why?] that diamonds are not the only things around to boycott - for example, oranges.  Umm, responding yes!, there are lots of things to boycott; true!  But diamonds are big...

I invited everybody to consider writing to the CRTC to complain about a particularly bad radio show on CFRA at Noon on June 22nd, where a representative from the Canada Israel Committee held forth for a full half hour with his extreme views with no alternative views given:  i.e. there was no occupation; Israel is surrounded by enemies; the attack on Gaza was about rockets; Israel was just defending itself from radical Islamists; liberals are hoodwinked by very clever radical Islamist elements.

Interesting:  Neish pointedly suggests 'we' get more questions.  I was done anyway, but the mike is whisked away.

Kevin Neish is asked at one point if he would go again.  He is not sure if he has it in him: 'I can't get into Israeli hands again; too brutal; humiliating' [this did not come through in his testimony and is a surprise.]

My companion, the young Mr. Parchelo, thanks Neish and Burney for their extreme bravery; suggests that in future they should consider giving more details on what was done to them by the Israelis.This is one of the best observations of the evening, besides the woman who gave the Green Party rep, Jean-Luc Cook, an opportunity to recover from his earlier disastrous explanation of the Green position on the occupation of the West Bank and the siege of Gaza.  [Nope.  He failed. Twice. Without apology.  'There are two sides to every story', and that was the story Cook was sticking with.]

The fact of the matter was that we were there to hear from Neish and Burney about what they saw, what they heard, and, importantly, what they themselves experienced. Neish appeared as if he almost wanted to flee the room.  "What do you want to know?!  About the repeated body cavity searches?!"

There was a sharp intake of breath from the audience.  Kevin Neish, a man of peace, was clearly traumatized by Israel's base treatment of him - little different from repeatedly being raped.  He could talk about bullet holes in the sides of heads of the innocents carried past him - he could stand and bear witness for them; but not about his own humiliation and degradation.  No.  He would not, perhaps could not, talk about that.

In closing, we heard from Dillon Penner, member, both of the Palestinian Solidarity Committee, as well as Independent Jewish Voices:  'It is not anti-Semitic to criticize Israel - it is our moral obligation.'

Comment - On cooking glaciers

Commenting on New York Times' Nicholas D. Kristof's, 'Our Beaker is Starting to Boil'; July 18, 2010:

Enjoyed your article on global warming and retreating glaciers with resultant water scarcity and crop failure. You allude to soot from smoke as one source of glacier melt - black soot settles on white glaciers absorbing heat from the sun. You're a bang-for-your-buck maximal help for humanity kind of guy. Perhaps a future column on the campaign to replace a major soot contributor - hundreds of thousands (millions?) of cooking fires - with (solar? natural gas? - I forget) cleaner energy cooking solutions for Asia's rural masses. Would no doubt improve maternal/family health from breathing cleaner air, too.


              - Diane V. McLoughlin, editor, mcloughlinpost.com

Good backgrounder: 'World's Pall of Black Carbon Can Be Eased with New Stoves'; Jon R. Luoma, Mar. 8, 2010; published in Yale Environment 360;discusses drive by scientific and business communities to come up with cheap, more environmentally friendly stoves to reduce enviromental soot and improve human health.

July 17, 2010

letter to editor verified, bounced yet again by Ottawa Citizen - this one on nuclear energy

Letters to the editor of the Ottawa Citizen, usually verified - now not published. Controlling the message.  My July letter on nuclear energy, in respone to their uninformed 'Suddenly Lights Out'; July 8, 2010:

Over many years the Ottawa Citizen's editorial board has maintained a steadfast belief in the superiority of nuclear energy, without providing any proof that alternative energy could not sustain us, or that nuclear energy could. Nuclear does not gear up and go by itself without massive, massive taxpayer funds in the billions of dollars. Nuclear energy production is always oversold as to its long-term reliability, when evidence clearly shows that these plants break down like all other things man-made. Nuclear plants can become catastrophically dangerous when they degrade - yet we seem to assume that society will be forever stable enough to deal with nuclear plant breakdowns, and that no unexpected disruptive event could occur to inhibit us from doing so (plague, war, earthquake, e.g.). Nuclear energy plants incur gigantic cost overruns to overhaul and maintain them - again, at our expense. I recall hearing the analogy that if every rooftop in the greater Toronto area had solar panels, there would be enough energy to power the entire province. True? False? Let's find out what we can do. The province should not so hastily decide not to subsidize production of solar energy. Costs and benefits must be weighed carefully. Power that travels vast distances, as electricity must do coming from distant nuclear generating stations, is extraordinarily inefficient - so much electricity is lost per kilometer travelled down electrical lines. Nuclear fuel is a finite energy source that will run out. We have never come up with safe storage solutions for lethally toxic nuclear waste byproduct. Faith in nuclear looks more like religious belief rather than knowledge based on fact. The age of oil is coming to an end. We cannot afford to make any errors in which ways we decide to go in searching for our long-term energy solutions.

                          - Diane V. McLoughlin

"THEY ARE NEVER GOING TO GET INSIDE MY HEAD"

July 07, 2010

Gifted Education - A Parent Joins the Debate

by Diane V. Mcloughlin

July 4, 2010:  My son is a gifted young man who is at risk of becoming a high school drop-out. I am far from the only parent to face this sinking boat.

Some things he is good at and some things he isn't. He has needed help. Perhaps because of the label, he has been browbeaten plenty. He has never received help - or recognition and fostering of his strengths.

One of his strengths appears to be irretrievably lost. He was retested in Grade Six. A new school, considering his performance, didn't believe he was gifted. Could we do a few tests? Sure, I said.

In some ways he was struggling. This was clear. Great. Fantastic. So you'll help him? Oh, no, we don't have the resources to help him.

In other ways? Still gifted. Spec. Ed. teacher of forty-years plus experience told me she had never had a kid score as he did in science; in point of fact she couldn't tell me with any accuracy his aptitude. For the first time she ran out of questions to ask, somewhere in the third year of university on the hypothetical scale. (He did very well on other parameters, as well.)

But try to suggest science when thinking about careers - after his scholastic experiences? Tragic.

My son was tested and formally identified at the end of second year kindergarten. I had noticed some things early on and discussed testing with a doubtful but kind teacher. This is an interesting facet of the gifted issue: teachers do not do well statistically at picking out gifted kids. You can't tell by looking at kids whether they're gifted. Sometimes they are bored and disengaged. Sometimes a learning disability is masking the giftedness, in what is referred to in the biz as a dual exceptionality.

He was placed in a highly gifted class in Grade One.

There is a misconception about gifted kids' parents; some of them, anyway. When I first noticed my kid doing unusual things (two and a half yrs old) - like, when out for walks he'd point to vehicles and tell me, 'Mazda; Civic; Ford...'. I was scared: Of boredom. Dropping out. Arrogance...few things are worse than thinking you are smarter than everybody else with little to no evidence to the contrary in one's day to day.

Identification is one thing; which teachers migrate to gifted classes is another. A few gifted classroom teachers, in this parent's experience, are seemingly there for all the wrong, resume-fattening reasons. They cannot relate to their mentally fleet young charges. Some teachers become overtly hostile - to polite, inquisitive young children who love to learn - go figure.

Anyone who believes that a gifted kid can wait until he is older before being tested and appropriately placed, anyone who thinks that the gifted kid in kindergarten is merely learning to tie his shoes and learn his letters and numbers like everyone else - is going to cause a lot of damage if they have any authority.

LIke the kid who, in kindergarten, wanted to know all about wars. He devoured books on the topic - adult books. The kindergarten teacher, his mother lamented to me when we met a few years hence, plunked her little boy in a corner with a stack of books and left him there. 'What am I supposed to do?', the resentful teacher asked the broken-hearted mother, whose son came off the school bus every day crying because the other kids shunned him and called him a freak - '...the other kids don't even know their letters. I have to get them ready for Grade One.'

To delay gifted testing is to say that it is ok to allow receptive minds to rot - for years. We value the gifted sprinter; the star quarterback; but the lightning-quick mind?

'Don't worry Dad; I'm sure I'll learn something next year' - gifted boy to his worried father, first day of Grade Four.

The most perverse experience, beyond leaving union-protected hostile teachers in the gifted class, is that, at least where I live, gifted kids are placed in their own classrooms (if they are lucky enough to win the lottery and get one of few limited spaces) but the school board refuses to alter the curricula - they are still expected to drag their intellects at the regular pace.

Sometimes you'll get good teachers who will explore subjects more deeply. Bonus!

Sometimes report cards come home and you've got B's and C's or whatever on them, when tests and assignments were A's. Not good. A teacher thinks, wrongly, she must mark harder. Get a teacher like that in the latter grades of high school when your kid is trying to apply to university admissions, and you have an interesting fight on your hands. Thus, for the last grade or two many parents in my district will encourage their gifted kids to migrate back to the regular program so their marks are not screwed up.

A third of high school drop-outs have averages of A or B. That's my understanding. Can we afford to lose them? From everything we see? I fear not.
-------------------------------------------
My Comment No. 3, to NYT Room for Debate blog post, 'The Pitfalls in Identifying a Gifted Child'; July 4, 2010