Showing posts with label Israel lobby. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel lobby. Show all posts

July 25, 2014

Genocide of #Gaza - Fearful Implications for #Israel and Jews

Diane V. McLoughlin 

July 24, 2014  
                                Israel lobbies the world over to accept the definition of Israel as a Jewish collectivity. They push to categorize it as anti-Semitic to suggest that Israel is anything other than that - Jewish. Many countries have stern laws punishing people for saying anything anti-Semitic, rightly so. What it means, though, is that there are those who lobby to change laws so that they can push to have people put in jail and otherwise legally harassed for suggesting that Israel has anybody else living there in significant numbers other than Jews, sometimes referred to as the 'new anti-Semitism'.  The problem with this is that there a lot of people who live in Israel who are, in fact, not Jews.  They are Palestinians, native to the land, while many Jews are either European immigrants, or first or second generation descendants of same.  

Why would they attempt this?  In part, through fear.  More than once in human history, Jews have been a minority in one country or another in Europe where they suffered horrendous religious persecution, expelled from their homes; tortured; murdered. After the Nazis under Germany's Hitler massacred millions of Jews during the mid-twentieth century in Europe, the Jews of the world today are traumatized still. Many fear the only place they can be safe is in a country of their own. I don't think this is true. It's possible that at no time in Jewish history have Jews been more accepted, woven into and rendering complete the fabric of the societies in which they dwell.  


The implications of this power struggle, both within Israel and without to establish as fact that Israel is Jewish, are ominous. Genocide of the Palestinian people on the one hand, and a dire new form of anti-Semitism arising in the world in aghast reaction to any such attempt to ethnically cleanse Palestine of the Palestinian people. 


If we care about human rights, if we care about Jews, Palestinians, justice, civil rights and international law, then we have a moral duty to try to avert genocide of the Palestinian people while stamping out embers of anti-Semitism - at once, and at the same time.  


Over twenty percent of the citizens of Israel-proper are Palestinian. That statistic does not take into account the millions of Palestinians living under Israeli military occupation in the West Bank, the Palestinians enduring a seven year military blockade in Gaza, or the refugees in Lebanon, Jordan, and beyond.

There is a disturbing thread of racism warping the fabric of Israeli society.  Evidence for this can be seen in the following article by 
Moshe Feiglin, Deputy Speaker of the Knesset (Israel's parliament): 


'My Outline for a Solution for Gaza: by Moshe Feiglin'; Manhigut Yehudit; jewishjournal.org, July 15, 2014.  


MK Feiglin alarmingly chooses the term 'solution' for his proposals regarding the Palestinians in Gaza, the very term Germany's Nazis used in discussing proposals to dispose of a so-called Jewish 'problem'; sipping champagne, sampling delicacies at table, Nazi elites casually tossed around methods and means that would most efficiently exterminate the entire population of the European continent's Jews [and Roma; political opponents and critics; journalists; homosexuals; Jehovah's Witnesses; and the physically and mentally handicapped, as well.]    


There are many Jews who devote themselves to making Israel (and indeed the world) a better place. Thousands protest the bombing of Gaza and the occupation of the Palestinians in the West Bank.  It's a moving experience to witness Muslims, Jews, Palestinians, Christians and peace advocates at protests in support of justice and human rights for everybody. They make me happy and full of hope for the human race.  




      
                       Protest against Israel's assault on Gaza
                      Parliament Hill, Ottawa, Canada's capital
                                          July 14, 2014
                        Photo by Emily McLoughlin-Coleman    


We have to learn to accept as given at this (hopefully mid, possibly late) juncture in human history, that individuals with no natural human feeling toward their fellows rise to the top of political power structures sometimes, even though they are emphatically and confoundedly not the cream.  


One element in human society that aids their rise to power is, as previously asserted, fear. Other pitfalls are religious chauvinism; convictions of superiority of one's culture or way of life; intolerance; and an unwillingness to permit others to live and believe as they wish.  These risks and pitfalls are part of the human condition. These weaknesses of human nature do not discriminate with regard to which human society they may choose to befall next.

God, if he exists, did not make all flowers one color, shape, size and height. They do not flower all at once. They produce many different kinds of fruit. The evidence supports the idea that God, or creation, loves variety in a glorious profusion so much so that creation is not static, but is on the contrary ever evolving and changing.  The scientific fact of the matter is that variety in life is a fundamental requirement in the survival of all that lives.


Men such as Mr. Feiglin appear to be blind to any such notions. What he writes, what he wants is clear: Gaza Palestinians - 'A' - separated from the land - 'B'. By international norms of law, his ideas meet the definition of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. [Comments in square brackets are mine.]  


Below are excerpts from Moshe Feiglin's manifesto:


               '1. Ultimatum – One warning from the Prime Minister of Israel to the enemy population, in which he announces that Israel is about to attack military targets in their area and urges those who are not involved and do not wish to be harmed to leave immediately. Sinai [a desert] is not far from Gaza and they can leave . This will be the limit of Israel’s humanitarian efforts...;


                      2. Attack - [Feiglin stipulates he would provide no consideration for civilians being used as human shields, but he places the words in parentheses like so: 'human shields' - so apparently, what he really means is no effort should be expended to protect Gaza civilians trapped in the conflict.  The indiscriminate bombing of civilian homes, hospitals and schools, etc., by the Israeli Defense Force (IDF), would bear this out as a widely-held view];


                     '3. Siege - '...a total siege on Gaza. Nothing will enter the Strip. Israel, however, will allow exit from Gaza. (Civilians may go to Sinai [again, this proposal that 1.8 million people should depart from home and be cast out into a  desert], fighters may surrender to IDF forces).'


                 ...'6. Elimination - 'thoroughly eliminate all armed enemies from Gaza. The enemy population that is innocent of wrong-doing and separated itself from the armed terrorists will be treated in accordance with international law and will be allowed to leave. Israel will generously aid those who wish to leave. 


                      '7. Sovereignty – Gaza is part of our Land and we will remain there forever. Liberation of parts of our land forever is the only thing that justifies endangering our soldiers in battle to capture land. Subsequent to the elimination of terror from Gaza, it will become part of sovereign Israel and will be populated by Jews. This will also serve to ease the housing crisis in Israel....[blah, blah, blah, a fig leaf is tacked on about offering the few Palestinians who are left citizenship on a case by case basis some long, distant and hazy point down the road, after the successful ethnic cleansing of the rest of them.  Tokens, if you will.] 


We all have moral choices to make and our choices affect our associations by either enriching or diminishing what potential for happiness we can attain. When population groups in any country garner superior government favor and exercise license to discriminate against others they diminish their own prospects for happiness.

We each have greater prospects for happiness if we all enjoy equality before the law. 


The Feiglins of the world are disturbers of the peace. They diminish our prospects for happy coexistence.  To propose that two million people ought to abandon their homes so other people can move in is criminal, beneath contempt, a proposal of a form of genocide which attempts to eliminate a people from a region. 


Those attempting to squelch discussion regarding Israel's perilous political path with scurrilous accusations of a 'new anti-Semitism', are misguided, at best.  The world is at its brightest point for putting anti-Semitism in the past and leaving it there for good.  With tact and resolve we must work together to bring justice and peace for all the people of Palestine.




     

December 22, 2010

Nail Down the Goal Posts to Israel-Palestine Peace

By Diane V. McLoughlin, November 22, 2010

main website:  mcloughlinpost.com

The problem, in politics as in life itself, is that, infuriatingly, the goal posts move while we're busy digging-in at what we thought was something approximating a finish line. If Clinton can be the historic fundamental force that hammers out a two-state agreement that Right and Left in Israel will abide by, and that Hamas and Fatah believe is just - great.

Equally historic will be the hangover - mine - from celebrating the anticipated rippling outward of peace in the world. 

But many are coming around to the view that the goal posts have in fact moved way beyond the possibilities of a two-state solution now, and it's not just the 500,000 Jewish colonizers occupying Palestinian space that makes this so.

One bi-national state with citizenship, equal rights and the vote for all - this is where the goal posts are being moved to and we need to catch up to the reality of the situation.

An article published just yesterday in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz states flatly that South African apartheid 'is already here'. (1)

There is a less-than-subtle discriminatory tone in this NYT piece that does nothing to elevate the discussion:
'...self-pitying, self-dramatizing Palestinian psyche, with all the cloying accoutrements of victimhood' - zounds! If there's one thing we find intolerable it is the expression of pain from victims of occupation and ethnic cleansing - puts us off our tea, eh what? To say this as a generalization of Jews would be considered beyond the pale...rightly so; a double standard by any measure.

Helpful hints on Israeli apartheid laws: the proposed 'Loyalty Oath' (2); giving Israeli neighborhood community groups the power to vet and reject prospective residents (3); the land laws that the state utilizes to ensure to this day that only Jews reside on land that was wrenched from the indigenous Palestinians (4); the marriage laws (5); Jews-only roads (6); military order 1650 empowering the expulsion of Palestinians from their homes in the West Bank (and making them actually pay a fee to cover their expulsion's expense) (7); etc.


With the exception of Gaza, the truth of the matter is that Jews and Palestinians do not live apart. One group is the preferred group with full rights of citizenship; the other does not have equal rights. In the West Bank and Gaza, Palestinians have no rights at all, including the right, it seems, to be represented by those they would democratically choose if given the opportunity. Fayyad and Abbas have no mandate and it behooves Clinton to acknowledge that Palestinian elections are long-overdue.

Anyway, the U.S. shot the Palestinians in the foot when it made this latest deal: to block any Palestinian proposal with the U.N. security council to unilaterally declare its statehood, in exchange for an Israeli promise to halt - for all of three months?! - expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank. This is a complete non-starter guaranteed to deliver a still-birth of a peace deal. No one could blame the Muslim world for thinking that was the aim all along. (8)

Speaking of feet, there are quiet efforts afoot to move the goal posts of what meets the definition of anti-Semitism; some would like it to be categorized as hate speech to suggest that Israel is not a 'Jewish collectivity' when over 20% of Israel's citizens are Arab-Israeli. Include Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank and the refugees and the numbers are closer to a 50-50 even split. That's right. I said it. (9)

I read today that USAID helps fund with our tax dollars settler roads in the West Bank. (10) And of course that hardly tells the whole tale of the annual billions in U.S. tax dollars that enable Israel.

All gold carrot and no stick is a poor policy when applied solely to one side of a two-sided dispute.

________________

Notes:


(1) Article, 'South Africa is already here'; Zvi Bar'el; Haaretz; Oct. 31, 2010;
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/south-africa-is-already-here-1.322052 ;

(2) 'Israeli Arab MK: Loyalty oath relegates Israel's Palestinian citizens to inferior status
In a New York Times op-ed, Ahmed Tibi says the loyalty oath is a 'punch in the
gut to Palestinians who for more than 60 years have struggled to achieve equal
rights in Israel'; Haaretz; Oct. 22, 2010;
http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israeli-arab-mk-loyalty-oath-relegates-israel-s-palestinian-citizens-to-inferior-status-1.320624 ;

(3) 'Knesset panel approves controversial bill allowing towns to reject residents
Israeli Arab MKs al-Sana and Tibi walk out on committee discussion, calling it a
'criminal law' aiming to prevent Arabs from joining Israeli towns'; By Jonathan Lis
and Jack Khoury; Oct. 27, 2010; Haaretz; [*FTA: 'The committee's chairman,
David Rotem (Yisrael Beiteinu), responded to claims the bill was meant to reject
Arabs from joining Israeli towns. "In my opinion, every Jewish town needs at least
one Arab. What would happen if my refrigerator stopped working on a Saturday?"]
http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/knesset-panel-approves-controversial-bill-allowing-towns-to-reject-residents-1.321433 ;

(4) 'Who needs the JNF?'; Haaretz editorial; Sept. 23, 2007;
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/who-needs-the-jnf-1.229832 ;

(5) 'The existing laws suffice'; Haaretz; July 31, 2003;
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/the-existing-laws-suffice-1.95824 ;

(6) 'Peace Now slams gov't W. Bank Investments'; by tovah lazaroff and rebecca anna stoil; JPost;
08/26/2007; http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=73272 ;

(7) Israeli military order 1650; Wikipedia;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_military_order_1650 ;

(8) 'The endgame for the peace process - Indepth
Future historians will argue over the precise moment when the Arab-Israeli peace process died;
Robert Grenier; Al-Jazeera; Nov. 21, 2010;
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/2010/11/20101120114435124111.html ;

(9) 'Hate Speech Laws to Shield Israel From Accountability?'; Diane V. McLoughlin; Nov. 8, 2010;
http://www.mcloughlinpost.com/Hate-Speech-Laws-to-Shield-Israel-from-Accountability.html ;

(10) 'US Funds Israel's Apartheid Roads Plan'; Jonathan Cook; ANTI-WAR.COM; May 16, 2010;
http://original.antiwar.com/cook/2010/05/15/us-funds-israels-apartheid-roads-plan/ ;

copyright 2010, Diane V. McLoughlin
All Rights Reserved.