Showing posts with label Zionism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zionism. Show all posts

July 25, 2014

Genocide of #Gaza - Fearful Implications for #Israel and Jews

Diane V. McLoughlin 

July 24, 2014  
                                Israel lobbies the world over to accept the definition of Israel as a Jewish collectivity. They push to categorize it as anti-Semitic to suggest that Israel is anything other than that - Jewish. Many countries have stern laws punishing people for saying anything anti-Semitic, rightly so. What it means, though, is that there are those who lobby to change laws so that they can push to have people put in jail and otherwise legally harassed for suggesting that Israel has anybody else living there in significant numbers other than Jews, sometimes referred to as the 'new anti-Semitism'.  The problem with this is that there a lot of people who live in Israel who are, in fact, not Jews.  They are Palestinians, native to the land, while many Jews are either European immigrants, or first or second generation descendants of same.  

Why would they attempt this?  In part, through fear.  More than once in human history, Jews have been a minority in one country or another in Europe where they suffered horrendous religious persecution, expelled from their homes; tortured; murdered. After the Nazis under Germany's Hitler massacred millions of Jews during the mid-twentieth century in Europe, the Jews of the world today are traumatized still. Many fear the only place they can be safe is in a country of their own. I don't think this is true. It's possible that at no time in Jewish history have Jews been more accepted, woven into and rendering complete the fabric of the societies in which they dwell.  


The implications of this power struggle, both within Israel and without to establish as fact that Israel is Jewish, are ominous. Genocide of the Palestinian people on the one hand, and a dire new form of anti-Semitism arising in the world in aghast reaction to any such attempt to ethnically cleanse Palestine of the Palestinian people. 


If we care about human rights, if we care about Jews, Palestinians, justice, civil rights and international law, then we have a moral duty to try to avert genocide of the Palestinian people while stamping out embers of anti-Semitism - at once, and at the same time.  


Over twenty percent of the citizens of Israel-proper are Palestinian. That statistic does not take into account the millions of Palestinians living under Israeli military occupation in the West Bank, the Palestinians enduring a seven year military blockade in Gaza, or the refugees in Lebanon, Jordan, and beyond.

There is a disturbing thread of racism warping the fabric of Israeli society.  Evidence for this can be seen in the following article by 
Moshe Feiglin, Deputy Speaker of the Knesset (Israel's parliament): 


'My Outline for a Solution for Gaza: by Moshe Feiglin'; Manhigut Yehudit; jewishjournal.org, July 15, 2014.  


MK Feiglin alarmingly chooses the term 'solution' for his proposals regarding the Palestinians in Gaza, the very term Germany's Nazis used in discussing proposals to dispose of a so-called Jewish 'problem'; sipping champagne, sampling delicacies at table, Nazi elites casually tossed around methods and means that would most efficiently exterminate the entire population of the European continent's Jews [and Roma; political opponents and critics; journalists; homosexuals; Jehovah's Witnesses; and the physically and mentally handicapped, as well.]    


There are many Jews who devote themselves to making Israel (and indeed the world) a better place. Thousands protest the bombing of Gaza and the occupation of the Palestinians in the West Bank.  It's a moving experience to witness Muslims, Jews, Palestinians, Christians and peace advocates at protests in support of justice and human rights for everybody. They make me happy and full of hope for the human race.  




      
                       Protest against Israel's assault on Gaza
                      Parliament Hill, Ottawa, Canada's capital
                                          July 14, 2014
                        Photo by Emily McLoughlin-Coleman    


We have to learn to accept as given at this (hopefully mid, possibly late) juncture in human history, that individuals with no natural human feeling toward their fellows rise to the top of political power structures sometimes, even though they are emphatically and confoundedly not the cream.  


One element in human society that aids their rise to power is, as previously asserted, fear. Other pitfalls are religious chauvinism; convictions of superiority of one's culture or way of life; intolerance; and an unwillingness to permit others to live and believe as they wish.  These risks and pitfalls are part of the human condition. These weaknesses of human nature do not discriminate with regard to which human society they may choose to befall next.

God, if he exists, did not make all flowers one color, shape, size and height. They do not flower all at once. They produce many different kinds of fruit. The evidence supports the idea that God, or creation, loves variety in a glorious profusion so much so that creation is not static, but is on the contrary ever evolving and changing.  The scientific fact of the matter is that variety in life is a fundamental requirement in the survival of all that lives.


Men such as Mr. Feiglin appear to be blind to any such notions. What he writes, what he wants is clear: Gaza Palestinians - 'A' - separated from the land - 'B'. By international norms of law, his ideas meet the definition of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. [Comments in square brackets are mine.]  


Below are excerpts from Moshe Feiglin's manifesto:


               '1. Ultimatum – One warning from the Prime Minister of Israel to the enemy population, in which he announces that Israel is about to attack military targets in their area and urges those who are not involved and do not wish to be harmed to leave immediately. Sinai [a desert] is not far from Gaza and they can leave . This will be the limit of Israel’s humanitarian efforts...;


                      2. Attack - [Feiglin stipulates he would provide no consideration for civilians being used as human shields, but he places the words in parentheses like so: 'human shields' - so apparently, what he really means is no effort should be expended to protect Gaza civilians trapped in the conflict.  The indiscriminate bombing of civilian homes, hospitals and schools, etc., by the Israeli Defense Force (IDF), would bear this out as a widely-held view];


                     '3. Siege - '...a total siege on Gaza. Nothing will enter the Strip. Israel, however, will allow exit from Gaza. (Civilians may go to Sinai [again, this proposal that 1.8 million people should depart from home and be cast out into a  desert], fighters may surrender to IDF forces).'


                 ...'6. Elimination - 'thoroughly eliminate all armed enemies from Gaza. The enemy population that is innocent of wrong-doing and separated itself from the armed terrorists will be treated in accordance with international law and will be allowed to leave. Israel will generously aid those who wish to leave. 


                      '7. Sovereignty – Gaza is part of our Land and we will remain there forever. Liberation of parts of our land forever is the only thing that justifies endangering our soldiers in battle to capture land. Subsequent to the elimination of terror from Gaza, it will become part of sovereign Israel and will be populated by Jews. This will also serve to ease the housing crisis in Israel....[blah, blah, blah, a fig leaf is tacked on about offering the few Palestinians who are left citizenship on a case by case basis some long, distant and hazy point down the road, after the successful ethnic cleansing of the rest of them.  Tokens, if you will.] 


We all have moral choices to make and our choices affect our associations by either enriching or diminishing what potential for happiness we can attain. When population groups in any country garner superior government favor and exercise license to discriminate against others they diminish their own prospects for happiness.

We each have greater prospects for happiness if we all enjoy equality before the law. 


The Feiglins of the world are disturbers of the peace. They diminish our prospects for happy coexistence.  To propose that two million people ought to abandon their homes so other people can move in is criminal, beneath contempt, a proposal of a form of genocide which attempts to eliminate a people from a region. 


Those attempting to squelch discussion regarding Israel's perilous political path with scurrilous accusations of a 'new anti-Semitism', are misguided, at best.  The world is at its brightest point for putting anti-Semitism in the past and leaving it there for good.  With tact and resolve we must work together to bring justice and peace for all the people of Palestine.




     

November 13, 2011

Palestinian Freedom Rides




Palestinian Freedom Riders to Challenge Segregation By Riding Settler Buses to Jerusalem: 11.15.11

Palestinian activists will reenact the US Civil Rights Movement's Freedom Rides to the American South by boarding segregated Israeli public transportation in the West Bank to travel to occupied East Jerusalem.

Palestinian activists will attempt to board segregated Israeli public transportation headed from inside the West Bank to occupied East Jerusalem in an act of civil disobedience inspired by the Freedom Riders of the U.S. Civil Rights Movement in the 60's.

Fifty years after the U.S. Freedom Riders staged mixed-race bus rides through the roads of the segregated American South, Palestinian Freedom Riders will be asserting their right for liberty and dignity by disrupting the military regime of the Occupation through peaceful civil disobedience.

The Freedom Riders seek to highlight Israel's attempts to illegally sever occupied East Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank, and the apartheid system that Israel has imposed on Palestinians in the occupied territories.Several Israeli companies, among them Egged and Veolia, operate dozens of lines that run through the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, many of them subsidized by the state. They run between different Israeli settlements, connecting them to each other and cities inside Israel.

Some lines connecting Jerusalem to other cities inside Israel, such as Eilat and Beit She'an, are also routed to pass through the West Bank. Israelis suffer almost no limitations on their freedom of movement in the occupied Palestinian territory, and are even allowed to settle in it, contrary to international law. Palestinians, in contrast, are not allowed to enter Israel without procuring a special permit from Israeli authorities. Even Palestinian movement inside the Occupied Territories is heavily restricted, with access to occupied East Jerusalem and some 8% of the West Bank in the border area also forbidden without a similar permit.

While it is not officially forbidden for Palestinians to use Israeli public transportation in the West Bank, these lines are effectively segregated, since many of them pass through Jewish-only settlements, to which Palestinian entry is prohibited by a military decree.

- for more information, visit occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com

July 16, 2011

Youtube feature film - The Zionist Story



Film notes - The Zionist Story, an independent film by Ronen Berelovich, is the story of ethnic cleansing, colonialism and apartheid to produce a demographically Jewish State.

Ronen successfully combines archival footage with commentary from himself and others such as Ilan Pappe, Terry Boullata, Alan Hart and Jeff Halper.
"I have recently finished an independent documentary, The Zionist Story, in which I aim to present not just the history of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, but also the core reason for it: the Zionist ideology, its goals (past and present) and its firm grip not only on Israeli society, but also, increasingly, on the perception of Middle East issues in Western democracies.
These concepts have already been demonstrated in the excellent 'Occupation 101′ documentary made by Abdallah Omeish and Sufyan Omeish, but in my documentary I approach the subject from the perspective of an Israeli, ex-reserve soldier and someone who has spent his entire life in the shadow of Zionism.

I hope you can find a moment to watch The Zionist Story and, if you like it, please feel free to share it with others. (As both the documentary and the archived footage used are for educational purposes only, the film can be freely distributed).

April 30, 2010

Embarrassed for blind Zionism supporters

by Diane V. McLoughlin
main website:  mcloughlinpost.com

Apr. 30, 2010:  I'm an agnostic, so don't get me wrong, I'm not using the following quote to try to shill for any particular religion, but it seems to me that no truer words could possibly be spoken on the issue of blind defense of Israel than Christ's words attributed to him from the cross: 'forgive them, they know not what they do'.

Israel is not 'their' land, as is so blithely referred to of Jewish Zionists, not those portions owned and lived upon for millenia by Palestinians. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have been murdered or rendered homeless. When one asserts that Palestinian land is not Palestinian, what you are telling the world is that you are for murder.

The process of getting rid of the Palestinians is called ethnic cleansing. It is a disgusting racist enterprise that values one race over another. Let me give you a very direct example of precisely how racist the settler movement can actually be. In recent days, around November of last year, two extremist settler rabbis published a book comprising approximately 230 pages that define when and under what particular circumstances it is permissible to murder non-Jews - including babies.

(See: http://coteret.com/2009/11/09/settler-rabbi-publishes-the-complete-guide-to-killing-non-jews/ )

So when individuals describe themselves as proudly Zionist, one can't help but be more than a little embarrassed for them. I'm naive; I have a need to believe in the inherent goodness in most people, so I continue to assume that most people who instantly come out swinging in defense of 'Israel' have no idea what it is that they defend.

They are like 'Good Germans' of that evil era. Thing is, most people do not seem to be all that forgiving of the 'good German'- Germans who claimed they didn't know what was going on and thought they were just being good citizens supporting their country.

The only real peace possible at this point, in light of how much land has been stolen from the Palestinians, with the continual squeezing of the Palestinians into smaller and smaller prison-like compounds (Jews know such compounds in their European history as 'ghettos') - is one bi-national state with equal rights for all its citizens.

Imagine:: The one thing that Zionists fear above all else is to be forced to accept Palestinians as equal citizens with equal rights. They intrinsically believe that Palestinians are lesser human beings; that this would be the equivalent of the end of the world.

It would not be the end of the world if Israel were one embracing country of all its citizens both Jewish and Palestinian. It would be the beginning of a brighter, more peaceful and more just one. It will require dedicated advocacy from American grassroots organizing, because America's leadership tends to follow rather than lead. This brighter tomorrow must come, it will come and we must all do all that we can to help it to fruition.

March 24, 2010

On Robert Wright's breakthrough NYT article, Against 'Pro-Israel' (and why I think he's right)

by Diane V. McLoughlin, March 24, 2010
main website http://www.mcloughlinpost.com


I applaud Robert Wright for his strong and forthright opposition to the policies of Israel. Like him, I disagree with the strategies of her apologists.  Wright argues in the New York Times that calling critics of Israel's policies anti-Israel (or, more threateningly, anti-Semitic) actually works against Israel's best interests.  Without our continued efforts to point out where Israel is failing in other words, Israel will never be a success.
It seems to me that one of the biggest elements of the picture with the Israel-Palestine conflict is that Israel clings to the racist notion that it exists to the exclusive benefit of Jews.


Over 20% of Israel's citizens are Palestinian. No solution is going to be able to account for this sad reality for almost two million people who languish under constant oppressive and demeaning treatment as second-class citizens unless it is faced head-on.

This is one of the most important aspects of the problem that must be illuminated. Ynet News, the largest daily on-line Israel news site, and as far as I know a conservative publication, ran an article about the Mossawa Center's annual report on racism that shares that the Knesset is the most racist 'since the establishment of the state... [the report] reveals a 75% increase in discriminatory and racist bills submitted to the Knesset in the past year.'


Jonathan Cook writes in The National about a Jewish family who wanted to rent a home to their Bedouin friends. Three of their dogs were poisoned, vintage cars they owned were burned, their children are harassed at school; the municipality fights tooth and nail to find legal ways to keep the Bedouins out. Municipalities throughout Israel are adopting codes to keep Palestinian Israeli citizens out by forcing them to swear loyalty oaths pledging allegiance to: “Zionism, Jewish heritage and settlement of the land”, the very system that seeks to ethnically cleanse them out.


IPS reports from East Jerusalem of nightly IDF raids into family homes for the arrests of children: '...accelerated attacks by Israeli forces and Jewish settlers inside Silwan in particular, directed towards the community's youngest and most vulnerable population. Since January, at least 33 children from the area have been arrested, detained and interrogated by Israeli forces as home demolitions and settler takeovers continue apace. Muslem Odeh, [aged] 10, tells IPS that he was taken by Israeli forces on Mar. 11 at 3 am, after police broke into the family's home in Silwan's Bustan neighbourhood and pepper-sprayed his father who attempted to protect him...'; in the area of Bustan particularly we are told, the Arab children take their favorite toys and clothes with them to school every day because they worry they will have no home to return to at the end of the day.


A brief scan at uruknet.info finds that 90% of Gaza's water is polluted; the Israeli Education Ministry censors the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, more civilians killed in the occupied West Bank, and more air strikes launched against GazaEgypt works to complete its monstrosity of a steel wall that will cut off Gaza's last means of importing goods with which 1.5 million Gaza inhabitants depend, half of whom are children. (uruknet sources: Palestinian Center for Human Rights; Promised Land blog; www.rafahtoday.org .)


The apologists will tell you that Palestinian Israeli citizens have 'equal rights'; that Gaza had to be attacked because of rocket fire - Gaza was in the middle of abiding by a mutually agreed upon cease-fire (see CNN YouTube here) when Israel, rather than seizing the opportunity to work at normalizing relations with Gaza and lifting the military siege, girded for total destruction of Gaza instead.


In Canada, an unappointed group of Parliamentarians led by Irwin Cotler (the CPCCA) is busily spinning quietly in back rooms to come up with ways to create legal chill against public criticism of Israel - what they refer to as 'the new anti-Semitism'. Glen Greenwald is so right to refer to Canada's so-called 'hate speech' laws as 'creepy'. I'd go further: it's a fundamental threat to democracy and liberty. So's the McCain-Lieberman bill, S.3081 - but that's a story for another day.


Jewish Voice For Peace is asking everyone who abhors the current unmovable stasis of the situation to sign their PETITION: Tell President Obama: No more unconditional aid to Israel;
support his demand for an end to settlement construction. It reads, in part: 'Please withhold US aid to Israel until it agrees to abide by international law including ending settlement construction and lifting the blockade on Gaza.'


Petition link: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org...


And editorials of mine can be found at http://www.mcloughlinpost.com


For now.





Recommend


Commenting on Against 'Pro-Israel' - NYTimes.com




March 04, 2010

What is Wrong With Palestinians? (The Answer May Surprise You)

By Diane V. McLoughlin; Feb., 2010
www.mcloughlinpost.com
www.mcloughlinpost.blogspot.com

 At first blush it seems confusing, even rather silly and reactionary, for Palestinians to object to the rather innocuous move by Israel of declaring that in the West Bank there are features that are of Jewish historical significance. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu declared them to be Jewish  archeological and 'Zionist' heritage sites, according to the New York Times.

The sites in question are Ibrahimi Mosque, (also known variously as the Sanctuary of Abraham, and the Cave of the Patriarchs), and Rachel's Tomb.

In understanding why this might in any way be provocative, we first ought to be mindful of the fact that Abraham, who is believed to be buried at the Ibrahimi Mosque location, is revered by all three religions: Jewish, Christian and Muslim. 

But some are loathe to acknowledge this shared reverence for either Abraham or the land of Palestine itself.  In 1994, a militant New York-born Zionist, Baruch Goldstein, murdered, in a scene of utter carnage, as many as 52 Muslim worshippers while injuring 150, in the Ibrahimi Mosque.  (Goldstein was disarmed and subsequently beaten to death  - Wikipedia.)

In the Palestinian rioting that followed, Israel imposed a two-week curfew on the 120,000 Palestinian inhabitants of the city of Hebron, while 400 settlers continued to enjoy freedom of movement within their midst.

Goldstein is a hero to some Zionist settlers.  His grave was actually a shrine where settlers made pilgrimage. In 1999 after a legal ruling outlawing monuments to terrorists Goldstein's shrine and prayer area near his grave were bulldozed by the Israeli army.  (But reportedly, every year Jewish Zionist settlers have parties to celebrate the Goldstein murders.)

At Goldstein's funeral, Rabbi Yaacov Perrin declared that “one million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”

Baruch Goldstein was a physician, with all of the presumptive reverence for human life that ought to have entailed.

The fear which arises from Israel's listing of West Bank historical sites partly stems from the fact that Israel is viewed as being hostile to preserving Palestinian cultural heritage (see, for example, the 1,000 year old Mamilla cemetery in Jerusalem. Also, article, 'History Erased'; Meron Rapoport; '07; Haaretz.) Conversely, it is fair to say that there is sometimes a dirth of trust between both Jews and Palestinians when it comes to respecting and preserving each others' heritage at the site of al-Aqsa Mosque/Temple of the Mount.)

So, on the one hand there is concern that the history of the Palestinian people in the region - that stretches back millenia - is at risk of being destroyed and by its absence used  to disprove the significance and long-term existence of Palestinians in Israel.

On the other hand you have the highlighting of so-called 'Zionist' heritage sites in the occupied territories and the inviting of outsiders to come in to enjoy them while holding millions of Palestinian people hostage in a military occupation.  To do so ignores or tacitly minimizes the suffering caused to Palestinians by the illegal military occupation as if it, or they, didn't exist.. 

It seems to me that the objections by Palestinians of this recent declaration by Israel regarding the  historical significance of places in the Palestinian territories, which, I repeat, is currently under Israeli military occupation, really has nothing to do with whether or not there is Jewish historical significance attached to them.  It has everything to do with the fact that all historical sites in Palestinian territory should be under the care and stewardship of the Palestinians, who in turn should be in ownership and control of their own lands.  This follows Israel's own argument that the two peoples should be separated and apart.

In reality, Palestinians are denied the right to live free within their lands by the illegal, racist military occupation.  This military cover is used by Jewish-supremacist settlers to evict Palestinians from their homes and lands on the basis of religious and racist discrimination.

For some Israeli Jews it may be that, after the ultimate horrors of the Final Solution and the Holocaust, in their hearts the doors open to the possibility of trusting anyone not Jewish closed for good.  This is as understandable as it is tragic.  Out of fear we are capable of the worst atrocities.  One wonders how they could not fail to see the parallels in discussing final solutions to their 'Palestinian problem.'


        Auschwitz: child victims of Holocaust terror rolling up sleeves to show concentration camp I.D. tattoos.





Gaza, Operation Cast Lead; Khalil Hamra; AP



And of course, similar levels of fear and mistrust are instilled in the hearts of many Palestinians, too.

The underlying mindset of the far-right wing Likud Party currently in power in Israel, is articulated in the 1999 Likud Charter which proclaimed it is the right of Jews to settle in Gaza and the West Bank.

Some Likud members have been quoted as stating outrageously racist, derogatory slurs against the Palestinian people.  And it is not hard to find similar slurs toward Jews by Palestinian representatives. 

But are there any signs for hope? Wikipedia states that Netanyahu outlined in June, 2009, his vision of a future Palestinian state.  With current pressure to resume peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians coming both from the Arab League and the U.S., presumably sooner or later the Likud-ruling government of Israel will have to come clean on whether or not they are willing to deal on peace and how far they are willing to go.

And there are reports that Hamas may be more willing to negotiate, and have a more pragmatic view, than perhaps many Israelis realize. For example, 'Ismail Abu Shanab (assassinated by Israel) said that Hamas would halt its armed struggle if "the Israelis are willing to fully withdraw from the 1967 occupied territories and present a timetable for doing so." ('Hamas: The Last Chance for Peace?' - Henry Siegman; Apr. 27, '06; The New York Review of Books.)

As I allude to above, I am of the view that reconciliation would require the ability of both sides to articulate, and have acknowledged, the pain and suffering endured by both sides.

In a recent New York Times Op-Ed, 'Therapeutic diplomacy, not rational negotiation, is the way forward in the Middle East', Carlo Strenger, chairman of the clinical graduate psychology program at Tel Aviv University, argues that:

'The region’s collective traumas may easily lead one to conclude that the situation is hopeless. But the peace process stands a chance if it is seen not as a rational intervention but as a course of therapy that will allow both sides to work through emotional aspects of their traumas, dreams and shattered hopes.'

So in answer to the question what is wrong with Palestinians, as in all things context and inquiry are key to understanding.  And understanding can bring us closer to resolution of conflict.  That is what I continue to believe.

back to article on main website       back to main:  The McLoughlin Post