Showing posts with label 9/11. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 9/11. Show all posts

November 19, 2013

The Detroit Sleeper Cell That Was Not [NYTRetroReport 11mins]



The New York Times 

Retro Report [Subscribe on YouTube http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n]

Published November 18, 2013




'Six days after 9/11, the FBI's raid on a Detroit 

sleeper cell signaled America's resolve to fight terrorism. But, 

despite a celebrated conviction, there was one problem -- they'd 

gotten it wrong.'


Read the story here: http://nyti.ms/1iolX4Y

September 15, 2010

HOMEGROWN TAX n' WAR TERRORISTS

by Diane V. McLoughlin, main website mcloughlinpost.com

The real terrorists are cleverly disguised to look and sound just like you and me.  The real terrorists get you to sacrifice your kids in the military to protect their bottom line, while reaching into your back pockets. The real terrorists play you for suckers while laughing all the way to the bank. To find the real terrorists? You watch to see which way your tax money flows.

Americans, 10,000 or more from all walks of life, rolled out the Unity and Solidarity Rally (pictured, right; by AP); against anti-Muslim prejudice; pro-peace - in New York City, September 11th, 2010. Hopeful - but little reported. Symbolic acts aren't worth much if nobody actually gets to hear about them.

There is a purpose behind fomenting hatred against American Muslims. It is to deflect attention away from what's really going on; the real reasons why we wield our military might in places such as Iraq - a war that has cost American taxpayers an economy-destroying three trillion dollars and counting; real reasons why we are in Afghanistan -now the longest war in U.S. history. American Muslims are being used as scapegoats.

Smearing Muslims as terrorists also helps to shield Israel from criticism in its continued ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people. Bigotry, like power, has its privileges.

Radio, television and print media should all have to take an oath: 'I solemnly swear to tell the truth - the whole truth - and nothing but the truth.' The news would look very diifferent if there were legal consequences when any news outfit violates it. Truth is, the media lies both by omission - what they leave out - and by commission - what they put in.They do it so well, it's scary.

There was a big stink raised this year of course, about a Muslim cultural center planned two city blocks away from 9/11's Ground Zero. The center is variously called the Cordoba Initiative, or Park51. The group that wants to create this center bought the property, five years ago. It has apparently been a challenge so far to raise funds to develop it, and to get through the planning approval process, too.

In the vicinity of the proposed cultural center there is a strip club, along with other less-than-sparkly elements of modern city life - but these are not protested. The powers behind the throne, as part of their efforts to demonize Muslims, call it the 'Ground Zero Mosque'.It is not at Ground Zero, and it is not a mosque. But jokers are nothing, if not clever. Because no matter where, and no matter what - mosque, church or synagogue - it should not be a problem for anyone.

Some Americans think the cultural center is an offense to the memories of the people who were murdered on 9/11 because they believe the real purpose of the center is to glorify and celebrate 9/11. Spokespeople for the cultural center looked like they didn't know what hit them when, this year, protesters were whipped up into a frenzy against it. The Muslim group planned on including prayer space for Jews and Christians. They hoped to hold inter-faith gatherings to foster greater understanding between the faiths.

People who protest that this Muslim cultural center is an insult to the memories of those who were murdered on September 11, 2001, do so because they know that the men who attacked were Muslim. They think that the 9/11 attack was driven because the attackers were Muslim. 9/11 was not a religious act. It also was not an irrational act of hatred against the West. It was an act of revenge, a reaction, to American foreign policy.

We killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis over the course of our blockade and bombing campaign against Iraq (1993- 2003.) The 9/11 attack was fundamentally an immoral act, according to Islamic values. For the record, I am an Agnostic. (1)

I believe that the powers-that-be would stop the continuing demonization of innocent American Muslims if they could. But there is only one way to stop it and that's with the truth. And the truth would reveal far too much about the powers-that-be.

When 9/11 occurred it was devastating. It was devastating in its murderous destruction. It was devastating knowing that all those people were victims of their own government's misdeeds. I searched in vain for a U.S. media outlet that would say something, anything, about cause-and-effect on 9/11 and Iraq. We deliberately, utterly destroyed Iraq; an entire country and its people.

I'm going to repeat that because it is so hard to break through the sticky cobweb of lies that have been spun in our heads: We had already murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children in Iraq, between the years 1993 to 2001. Officially, we went to war against Iraq two years later - in 2003.

The truth has been marginalized completely. It is MIA. There were no weapons of mass destruction. (2) Saddam Hussein did not associate with al Qaeda. Iraq was a modern secular state. Not perfect, but Iraq wasn't a repressive theocracy, either. Over the days and weeks following 9/11, as the broken girders and the dust of the twin towers continued to smolder - I waited; I looked; I listened - for television stations, newspapers or local radio stations to TELL THEM WHY. Did not happen.

Why was - and is - it important to me? The first rule when you discover yourself in a hole is: Stop digging. How could the American people be expected to alter course, prevent the government from making further enemies, if they didn't know the real reasons behind 9/11?

On-line comments I wrote after reading 9/11 articles would not be posted and were weeded out. Letters to editors - rejected. I wrote op-eds. I am positive I was far from unique. You could not get through. The truth did not get through. The lies came quicker and quicker until they spilled, tumbling over themselves, blurring reality in the popular press and the market place of ideas beyond all recognition to prepare us for the pretty fireworks of 'Shock and Awe' - more bombing of Iraq, in the lead-up to going in.

There is a name for the rabbit hole that sucks you down into that unfamiliar alternate universe otherwise known as Reality - it's called history. The lies didn't start on 9/11. Next time you're in the same room as a Vietnam vet or Kent State student war protester, ask them.

Tell them I sent you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:

(1) Recommended: 'Top Ways 9/11 Broke Islamic Law'; Juan Cole; Informed Comment; Sept. 11, 2010; http://www.juancole.com/2010/09/top-ways-911-broke-islamic-law.html

(2)  Youtube, 'Bush admits there were no WMD's in Iraq';
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSN-Kku_rFE

*January 17, 1961 Farewell Address - U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower - 'The Warning'; Youtube clip; over 430,000 views; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY&feature=related ;

August 20, 2010

Today - NYT comment No. 70 Islamic Center Exposes Mixed Feelings

Comment (link) by Diane V. McLoughlin, August 20, 2010


The cultural center must be built, as is, where is.

The cultural center is not the problem here. The problem is the country is deteriorating because the people have been lied to, for so long, that they no longer know what is true.

As Ground Zero is on the New York Times' home turf, I hold it highly responsible.

When 9-11 occurred, the thing of utmost importance that needed to transpire, above and beyond anything else - from a news organization's perspective - was to analyse why it occurred. All the other questions were addressed: How, where, who, when, what?

On too many fronts, 'why' has been MIA in the mainstream American press for too long. Why did 9-11 happen? Why did they do it?

They hate us for our 'freedoms', was a direct insult, a slap in the face, to the collective intelligence.

The answers, should a news organization care to look for them, were simple and easy to obtain. Osama bin Laden published his 'Letter to America' itemizing, in a short list, what he viewed as America's crimes.

Even now, the New York Times doesn't want to discuss it. My comment to Douthat's 'Two Americas' several days ago, was censored.

Bin Laden had three top reasons for the 9-11 attack. Woefully few are the numbers of Americans that know them. I'll get to Barack Obama's shamefully inadequate response to the mosque controversy in a second.

I forget the order, but One: America is directly responsible for the murders of 500,000 Iraqi children. That is, a half-million children, not counting the adults, we killed in the ten-year military bombing and siege campaign we waged against Saddam Hussein's Iraq under President Clinton.

We bombed the water treatment plants - in a place that is in large part desert. We embargoed children's vaccines.

It is important to understand what we did: We waged biological warfare against Iraq's most vulnerable citizens. As night follows day, they died.

Two: We assist in buttressing the non-democratic regime in Saudi Arabia
- bin Laden is/was a Saudi citizen.

Three: Our direct financial and military support of Israel's ongoing oppression and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people (to the tune of 3 billion in U.S. tax-dollars, most in military hardware, each and every calendar year.)

9-11 was blowback. It was not, it had not, anything to do with Islam or Muslims. They happened to be Muslims. 9-11 was not part of a holy war to spread the faith or to destroy anothers'.

So three-thousand murdered over here, apparently this is sufficient for us to go to war over there.

But we kill 500,000 children over there before that, and you are going to sit there on your couch and tell me that they'll suck it up? There isn't an American on this planet that would think that - if they knew.

But Americans, instead, have been encouraged on the sly to assume that it's Muslims that are the enemy. They aren't the enemy. They are victims, just like good-hearted Americans have been hoodwinked - by their own government.

Obama should be ashamed of himself. When it reached his ears that some Americans wrongly had been led to believe that he is Muslim, he should have come out and challenged the bigots: So what? So what if I were? You got a problem with Muslims? What, you some kind of racist?

Instead, he reinforces the notion that Islam is somehow less desirable, not me, I'm no Muslim, deepening the threat to everybody's liberty because either we're all free, or none of us are secure in our freedom.

Now why would he do that?

Hopefully, you get the idea.

editor, mcloughlinpost.com

*Comment No. 70.  In response to, 'Islamic Center Exposes Mixed Feelings Locally'; Paul Vitello, NYT; Aug. 20, 2010

February 28, 2010

New York Times comment 329 by Diane V. McLoughlin to article by Frank Rich, The Axis of the Obsessed and Deranged

The level of rage and the violent imagery of some far-right speakers is deeply disturbing. Agreed.

However, there is too much over-generalization in your analysis and I find there is a certain over-zealousness in demonizing on the one hand, and lumping in on the other.

In the last federal election I did my own detailed analysis of all of the presidential candidates' political platforms. The candidates I endorsed were, in no particular order Ron Paul, Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel and Cynthia McKinney.

The one thing these individuals had in common that I was particularly interested in was a conviction that our foreign military adventures were wrong and that they would end them if elected president.

In light of this, many wondered whether Ron Paul was making a mistake remaining in the Republican Party, rather than running as an independent. Mr. Paul did respond to these concerns forthrightly by explaining that he always felt most at home ideologically in the republican camp.

I believe that it ought to give us pause amidst the din of the peripheral riff raff that Ron Paul won that recent straw poll at a republican party gathering - however narrow the margins. It was apparently enough to cause the republican party establishment to fall over themselves in their attempts to poo poo and minimize the significance of it.

If Mr. Paul beats out the rest of them by popular vote, it seems to me it has to have everything to do with what Mr. Paul stands for. And one of the most important things he stands for is the vision of America's founding fathers as a republic that encourages others to do good when it comes to foreign affairs, and certainly to enjoy trade with other nations, while limiting ourselves when it comes to military intervention rather than making enemies for ourselves all over the planet.

A note on Mr. Rich's sideswipe against 9/11 'truthers'. I find it more than just a little disappointing that Americans, including a group of over one thousand structural engineers who are trying to demand the investigation of evidence, of facts, on 9/11 - would be denigrated as nut jobs.

Post-9/11 was one of the worst periods for lack of journalistic integrity in the history of the American press. There is no reason whatever not to recover from past mistakes. Some NYT readership will not be happy with the truth if it runs counter to assumptions or preconceptions. But if the world is to avoid any more war we must have the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

With Obama saying out of one side of his mouth that he wants to help reduce the number of nukes in the world, while agreeing to vastly increase the budget for nuclear bombs out of the other side, it is going to take all of us working together to see us all through to a better day.

At the moment, the parallels between Orwell's '1984' and the current American government grow starker. War is NOT peace. And Building Seven was not hit by any plane but it fell straight down in seconds anyway.

www.mcloughlinpost.blogspot.com

February 26, 2010

VDARE.com: 02/25/10 - The Road to Armageddon

VDARE.com: 02/25/10 - The Road to Armageddon

By Paul Craig Roberts
 
Excerpt:  The Washington Times is a newspaper that looks with favor upon the Bush/Cheney/Obama/neocon wars of aggression in the Middle East and favors making terrorists pay for 9/11. Therefore, I was surprised to learn on February 24 that the most popular story on the paper’s website for the past three days was the "Inside the Beltway" report, "Explosive News," [By Jennifer Harper, February 22, 2010]about the 31 press conferences in cities in the US and abroad on February 19 held by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization of professionals which now has 1,000 members.
I was even more surprised that the news report treated the press conference seriously.
How did three World Trade Center skyscrapers suddenly disintegrate into fine dust? How did massive steel beams in three skyscrapers suddenly fail as a result of short-lived, isolated, and low temperature fires? "A thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7," reports the Washington Times.
The paper reports that the architects and engineers have concluded that the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the National Institute of Standards and Technology provided "insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers’ destruction" and are "calling for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials."
The newspaper reports that Richard Gage, the spokesperson for the architects and engineers said: "Government officials will be notified that ‘Misprision of Treason,’ U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382) is a serious federal offense, which requires those with evidence of treason to act. The implications are enormous and may have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Sheik Mohammed trial."
There is now an organization, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth. At the main press conference in San Francisco, Erik Lawyer, the head of that organization, announced the firefighters’ support for the architects and engineers’ demands. He reported that no forensic investigation was made of the fires that are alleged to have destroyed the three buildings and that this failure constitutes a crime.
Mandated procedures were not followed, and instead of being preserved and investigated, the crime scene was destroyed. He also reported that there are more than one hundred first responders who heard and experienced explosions and that there is radio, audio and video evidence of explosions.
Also at the press conference, physicist Steven Jones presented the evidence of nano-thermite in the residue of the WTC buildings found by an international panel of scientists led by University of Copenhagen nano-chemist Professor Niels Harrit. Nano-thermite is a high-tech explosive/pyrotechnic capable of instantly melting steel girders.
Before we yell "conspiracy theory," we should be aware that the architects, engineers, firefighters, and scientists offer no theory. They provide evidence that challenges the official theory. This evidence is not going to go away.
If expressing doubts or reservations about the official story in the 9/11 Commission Report makes a person a conspiracy theory kook, then we have to include both co-chairmen of the 9/11 Commission and the Commission’s legal counsel